themodsgrimm: (Default)
The Mods Grimm ([personal profile] themodsgrimm) wrote in [community profile] grimmoired2018-06-16 07:26 am
Entry tags:

CHAPTER 1: TRIAL

The Story Continues...
CHAPTER 1 - WEEK 1
34 Narrators Remain ;
Wakey wakey, naughty murder children. It's a lovely Saturday, after all. Breakfast is served piping hot at its usual time and all of the evidence has been removed from the scenes of yesterday. No matter how you choose to spent your morning though, the clock will begin to chime the moment both hands reach the large, ornate twelve.

Before your eyes materializes a door...but not just any door. Unlike the door leading to the festival, this door sits primly and properly right in front of the foyer. Whether you exit the castle on your own or you feel a friendly, invisible push, you begin to walk under an arc of wisterias. Behind you, the clock continues to chime with every step you take.

By the time the time the clock strikes twelve, you've entered a beautiful garden. In front of you is a long table, 19 seats on each side. Around the garden are several glass cases containing evidence collected yesterday. As noon intensifies on the sun-shaped clock, you'll find Tiger at the head of the table, a glass-covered rose near her right hand.

Tick tock, Narrators. You have nine hours to deliberate.

Throughout today's trial, the snow continues to fall as it has all week, though it's gentle and soft. Instead of tea and crumpets, today's snack bar includes the makings for s'mores, including sharp metal skewers. A fire could be built, should anyone have anything flammable. Additionally, every now and then, the howls of a group of wolves will penetrate the silence that occasionally falls on the the group...and sometimes even in the heat of the moment.



Welcome to your trial post!

Please see here for the OOC summary of events from yesterday's investigation.

In addition, please be sure to vote! Please see the voting page on how to vote, as we will have two special things to vote for. Voting will close at 9pm EST/6pm PST!

If you have any questions, please ask on our Discord server or ping us on plurk. Please direct pings for the NPC to Danielle ([plurk.com profile] entrappings), as she will be taking point for today's NPC, and the moderator team will be on deck for all other questions.


full navigation.
locations taken (statuses) stories (profiles)
info & faq wishing well private conversations

nivation: (10)

[personal profile] nivation 2018-06-16 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Would that make three total murders this week? If there were no footprints with Dave...

[ have we figured out when dave was killed yet ]

Or two murderers and an accomplice.
alchemenace: (& how ur abandoning me to these squares)

[personal profile] alchemenace 2018-06-16 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)
What counts as a murderer? Is it just the, um, killing blow?

[ listen this is a legitimate question ]
nivation: (14)

[personal profile] nivation 2018-06-16 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
If they schemed or helped caused the death, I'd cal them a a murderer. If they only helped after the action was done, I'd call them an accomplice.
alchemenace: (... but apparently not yours)

[personal profile] alchemenace 2018-06-16 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)
But ... is that the same definition Tiger and Dragon take for it? We can ask how many killers there were soon, but it does us no good if we don't know what a "killer" is.
nivation: (16)

[personal profile] nivation 2018-06-16 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
We can only vote for one person, so until we vote and it ends in a tie, we won't find out for certain.

Or I can ask.
alchemenace: (i was born for politics)

[personal profile] alchemenace 2018-06-16 09:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Let's... start with asking.
londonstar: (Default)

[personal profile] londonstar 2018-06-16 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
No, there would only be two. We would be looking for a murderer and their accomplice, who worked together in order to take both Dave and Soo-Won down.
nivation: (21)

[personal profile] nivation 2018-06-16 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)
[ I MEANT THREE TOTAL MURDERERS not murders cries ]

Do we know for sure that those who killed Soo-won also killed Dave?
toughchoices: (098)

[personal profile] toughchoices 2018-06-16 09:48 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't believe that we do. But -

[Reyna frowns.]

It's not an outlandish assumption to make, I think.
selfinserting: (give them no reason to stare)

[personal profile] selfinserting 2018-06-16 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
B-But why would they kill two people instead of one?
toughchoices: (024)

[personal profile] toughchoices 2018-06-16 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
[would you rather believe that multiple people independently decided to kill...]

One of them may have witnessed the death of the other. If the killer was already prepared to kill one, silencing another through death wouldn't be that much of a stretch.
selfinserting: (so i've got nothing to share)

[personal profile] selfinserting 2018-06-16 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
If that's the case... Then, um, who do you think was killed first?
toughchoices: (023)

[personal profile] toughchoices 2018-06-16 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
...perhaps Dave. The area surrounding him was more or less pristine - but if one of our killers was scratched enough to leave blood on a branch in the hedge maze, droplets of it might have been found around his body if he came second.
londonstar: (Default)

[personal profile] londonstar 2018-06-16 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Most likely Dave. If the snow covered the footprints it means that they were there for a longer time time than with the ones found by Soo-Won.
londonstar: (three.)

[personal profile] londonstar 2018-06-16 10:00 pm (UTC)(link)
[ he has to think about it for a while, and then frowns when he comes with an answer ]

Perhaps not. There are some discrepancies, considering that the possible footsteps around Dave have been covered by the snow while the ones around Soo-Won are partially covered. Therefore, we have a few possibilities:

One. That the possible two killers, or one killer and an accomplice, took down a person and then, for some reason such as possibly being witnessed or being told that they needed to kill someone else, decided to take another life.

Two. That you are correct and we may be dealing with more than two murderers-- the team that killed Soo-Won, and the possibly lone person that dealt with Dave.
nivation: (16)

[personal profile] nivation 2018-06-16 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I want to go with option one.

[ It's not a choice she makes based on logic. But Belph will come through the answer. ]

It would make this simpler.... and having fewer murderers is better, but if there's two, do we do anything to the second, if we solve the murder and correctly vote for one?